2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8 i (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Volkswagen Golf Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Volkswagen
Golf
Volkswagen Golf 1.8 4motion (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Golf
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CapellaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
MazdaMakeVolkswagen
CapellaModelGolf
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda CapellaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
0 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CapellaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CapellaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CapellaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
4575 mmLength4149 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1440 mmHeight1439 mm
1210 KgWeight1270 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2518 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…