DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Hyundai Lantra vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Hyundai Lantra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HyundaiMakeMazda
LantraModelCapella
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
128 HPPower125 HP
162 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/60 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4420 mmLength4575 mm
1700 mmWidth1695 mm
1393 mmHeight1440 mm
1247 KgWeight1210 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Hyundai Lantra and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Hyundai Lantra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…