2000 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 1.8 16V (122 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Chrysler Neon vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8 i (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Chrysler Neon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMazda Capella
ChryslerMakeMazda
NeonModelCapella
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMazda Capella
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
122 HPPower125 HP
160 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMazda Capella
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank60 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMazda Capella
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/60 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Chrysler NeonSpecificationMazda Capella
4390 mmLength4575 mm
1710 mmWidth1695 mm
1420 mmHeight1440 mm
1200 KgWeight1210 Kg
2665 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Chrysler Neon and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler Neon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…