2000 • Caterham
Seven
Caterham Seven Super 1.8 i 16V (124 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Caterham Seven vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8 i (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Caterham Seven
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Capella
CaterhamMakeMazda
SevenModelCapella
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Capella
5,9 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
124 HPPower125 HP
165 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Capella
PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank60 lt
12 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Capella
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
185/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Caterham SevenSpecificationMazda Capella
3380 mmLength4575 mm
1580 mmWidth1695 mm
1120 mmHeight1440 mm
550 KgWeight1210 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Caterham Seven and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Caterham Seven leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…