DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Saturn SL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSaturn
CapellaModelSL
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
125 HPPower126 HP
0 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R15 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4524 mm
1695 mmWidth1687 mm
1440 mmHeight1397 mm
1210 KgWeight1088 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Saturn SL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…