2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8 i (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Rover MGF Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
MGF
Rover MGF 1.8 i (120 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Rover MGF
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover MGF
MazdaMakeRover
CapellaModelMGF
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover MGF
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover MGF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover MGF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CapellaSpecificationRover MGF
4575 mmLength3913 mm
1695 mmWidth1628 mm
1440 mmHeight1464 mm
1210 KgWeight1060 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2375 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Rover MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…