2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8 i (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Hyundai Lantra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Hyundai
Lantra
Hyundai Lantra 1.8 16V (128 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Hyundai Lantra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CapellaSpecificationHyundai Lantra
MazdaMakeHyundai
CapellaModelLantra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda CapellaSpecificationHyundai Lantra
—0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
125 HPPower128 HP
0 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CapellaSpecificationHyundai Lantra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CapellaSpecificationHyundai Lantra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/60 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CapellaSpecificationHyundai Lantra
4575 mmLength4420 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1440 mmHeight1393 mm
1210 KgWeight1247 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Hyundai Lantra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Lantra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…