2000 • Mazda
Capella
Mazda Capella 1.8 i (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
2000 Mazda Capella vs 2000 Chrysler Neon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chrysler
Neon
Chrysler Neon 1.8 16V (122 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Chrysler Neon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChrysler Neon
MazdaMakeChrysler
CapellaModelNeon
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChrysler Neon
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
125 HPPower122 HP
0 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChrysler Neon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChrysler Neon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda CapellaSpecificationChrysler Neon
4575 mmLength4390 mm
1695 mmWidth1710 mm
1440 mmHeight1420 mm
1210 KgWeight1200 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2665 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Capella and 2000 Chrysler Neon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler Neon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…