2011 • Mazda
BT-50
Mazda BT-50 2.5 TD (143 Hp) 2011Overall Score62.5/100
2011 Mazda BT-50 vs 2012 Tata Sumo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Tata
Sumo
Tata Sumo 3.0 CR4 (85 Hp) 2012Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mazda BT-50
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BT-50SpecificationTata Sumo
MazdaMakeTata
BT-50ModelSumo
2011Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7/9
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda BT-50SpecificationTata Sumo
12,5 s0–100 km/h—
158 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2956 cc
143 HPPower85 HP
330 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders—
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BT-50SpecificationTata Sumo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BT-50SpecificationTata Sumo
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BT-50SpecificationTata Sumo
5075 mmLength4258 mm
1805 mmWidth1700 mm
1750 mmHeight1925 mm
1940 KgWeight—
3000 mmWheelbase2425 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Mazda BT-50 and 2012 Tata Sumo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda BT-50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableFord Ranger vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableSsangYong Chairman vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Captiva vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableOpel Antara vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableCitroen C-Crosser vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model yearsComments are loading…