DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2011 Mazda BT-50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C-Crosser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
C-CrosserModelBT-50
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
190 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
170 HPPower143 HP
232 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength5075 mm
1806 mmWidth1805 mm
1715 mmHeight1750 mm
1650 KgWeight1940 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Citroen C-Crosser and 2011 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…