2011 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 (166 Hp) 2011Overall Score63.25/100
2011 Ford Ranger vs 2011 Mazda BT-50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Mazda
BT-50
Mazda BT-50 2.5 TD (143 Hp) 2011Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda BT-50
FordMakeMazda
RangerModelBT-50
2011Model year2011
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda BT-50
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
175 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
166 HPPower143 HP
226 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda BT-50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda BT-50
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
255/70 R16Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda BT-50
5359 mmLength5075 mm
1850 mmWidth1805 mm
1815 mmHeight1750 mm
2048 KgWeight1940 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Ford Ranger and 2011 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…