2011 • Opel
Antara
Opel Antara 2.4 (167 Hp) 2011Overall Score63.25/100
2011 Opel Antara vs 2011 Mazda BT-50 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Mazda
BT-50
Mazda BT-50 2.5 TD (143 Hp) 2011Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Opel Antara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda BT-50
OpelMakeMazda
AntaraModelBT-50
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda BT-50
10,2 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
186 km/hTop speed158 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2500 cc
167 HPPower143 HP
230 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda BT-50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,1 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel AntaraSpecificationMazda BT-50
4596 mmLength5075 mm
1850 mmWidth1805 mm
1761 mmHeight1750 mm
—Weight1940 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Opel Antara and 2011 Mazda BT-50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…