2011 • Mazda
BT-50
Mazda BT-50 2.5 TD (143 Hp) 2011Overall Score62.5/100
2011 Mazda BT-50 vs 2011 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 (166 Hp) 2011Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BT-50SpecificationFord Ranger
MazdaMakeFord
BT-50ModelRanger
2011Model year2011
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda BT-50SpecificationFord Ranger
12,5 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
158 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
143 HPPower166 HP
330 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BT-50SpecificationFord Ranger
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption14,1 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BT-50SpecificationFord Ranger
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size255/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BT-50SpecificationFord Ranger
5075 mmLength5359 mm
1805 mmWidth1850 mm
1750 mmHeight1815 mm
1940 KgWeight2048 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase3220 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Mazda BT-50 and 2011 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableFord Ranger vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableSsangYong Chairman vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Captiva vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableOpel Antara vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableCitroen C-Crosser vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model yearsComments are loading…