2011 • Mazda
BT-50
Mazda BT-50 2.5 TD (143 Hp) 2011Overall Score62.5/100
2011 Mazda BT-50 vs 2011 Citroen C-Crosser Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2011 • Citroen
C-Crosser
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4i 16V (170) 2011Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Citroen C-Crosser
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BT-50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
MazdaMakeCitroen
BT-50ModelC-Crosser
2011Model year2011
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda BT-50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
12,5 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
158 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2500 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
143 HPPower170 HP
330 NmTorque232 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BT-50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BT-50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size215/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BT-50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
5075 mmLength4646 mm
1805 mmWidth1806 mm
1750 mmHeight1715 mm
1940 KgWeight1650 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2011 Mazda BT-50 and 2011 Citroen C-Crosser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableFord Ranger vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableSsangYong Chairman vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Captiva vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model years
VSImage unavailableOpel Antara vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model yearsVSImage unavailableCitroen C-Crosser vs Mazda BT-502011 and 2011 model yearsComments are loading…