DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Volvo S70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo S70
MazdaMakeVolvo
626ModelS70
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo S70
9,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
198 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2461 cc
167 HPPower140 HP
218 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo S70
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo S70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size190/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationVolvo S70
4745 mmLength4720 mm
1760 mmWidth1760 mm
1425 mmHeight1400 mm
1425 KgWeight1510 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Volvo S70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…