DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Navara vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
NavaraModel626
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
148 HPPower167 HP
208 NmTorque218 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank64 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5220 mmLength4745 mm
1850 mmWidth1760 mm
1774 mmHeight1425 mm
—Weight1425 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Navara and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…