DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chrysler Sebring vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeMazda
SebringModel626
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
210 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
166 HPPower167 HP
230 NmTorque218 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4760 mmLength4745 mm
1770 mmWidth1760 mm
1296 mmHeight1425 mm
1450 KgWeight1425 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chrysler Sebring and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…