DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volvo S70 vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S70SpecificationMazda 626
VolvoMakeMazda
S70Model626
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S70SpecificationMazda 626
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
200 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2461 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
140 HPPower167 HP
290 NmTorque218 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S70SpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
9 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S70SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
190/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S70SpecificationMazda 626
4720 mmLength4745 mm
1760 mmWidth1760 mm
1400 mmHeight1425 mm
1510 KgWeight1425 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volvo S70 and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…