2000 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 2.5 V6 (167 Hp) 2000Overall Score63.25/100
2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Nissan Navara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Navara
Nissan Navara 2.4 Double Cab 4WD (148 Hp) 2000Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 626SpecificationNissan Navara
MazdaMakeNissan
626ModelNavara
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda 626SpecificationNissan Navara
9,3 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
167 HPPower148 HP
218 NmTorque208 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 626SpecificationNissan Navara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 626SpecificationNissan Navara
4745 mmLength5220 mm
1760 mmWidth1850 mm
1425 mmHeight1774 mm
1425 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Nissan Navara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…