DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Chrysler Cirrus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChrysler
626ModelCirrus
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
198 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
167 HPPower164 HP
218 NmTorque221 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4746 mm
1760 mmWidth1822 mm
1425 mmHeight1374 mm
1425 KgWeight1364 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2743 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Chrysler Cirrus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…