DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSeat
626ModelAlhambra
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,6 s0–100 km/h16,4 s
192 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
116 HPPower110 HP
173 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank70 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption8,6 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4660 mmLength4617 mm
1710 mmWidth1810 mm
1515 mmHeight1728 mm
1280 KgWeight1754 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…