DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 806 vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeMazda
806Model626
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeEstate
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,8 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
175 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
109 HPPower116 HP
250 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption10,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4454 mmLength4660 mm
1834 mmWidth1710 mm
1714 mmHeight1515 mm
1670 KgWeight1280 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 806 and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…