DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Alhambra vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeMazda
AlhambraModel626
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
172 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
110 HPPower116 HP
235 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4617 mmLength4660 mm
1810 mmWidth1710 mm
1728 mmHeight1515 mm
1754 KgWeight1280 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Alhambra and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…