DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Honda Sm-x vs 2000 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 626
HondaMakeMazda
Sm-xModel626
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeEstate
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 626
7,2 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
131 HPPower116 HP
186 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 626
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda Sm-xSpecificationMazda 626
3950 mmLength4660 mm
1695 mmWidth1710 mm
1750 mmHeight1515 mm
1330 KgWeight1280 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Honda Sm-x and 2000 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…