DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationHonda Sm-x
MazdaMakeHonda
626ModelSm-x
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationHonda Sm-x
10,6 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
116 HPPower131 HP
173 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationHonda Sm-x
4660 mmLength3950 mm
1710 mmWidth1695 mm
1515 mmHeight1750 mm
1280 KgWeight1330 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…