DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 626 vs 2000 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationCitroen C5
MazdaMakeCitroen
626ModelC5
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationCitroen C5
10,6 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
192 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
116 HPPower90 HP
173 NmTorque236 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationCitroen C5
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank68 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationCitroen C5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationCitroen C5
4660 mmLength4618 mm
1710 mmWidth1770 mm
1515 mmHeight1476 mm
1280 KgWeight1360 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 626 and 2000 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…