DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Mazda 6 vs 2011 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Antara
MazdaMakeOpel
6ModelAntara
2011Model year2011
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Antara
9,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
211 km/hTop speed186 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
163 HPPower167 HP
0 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Antara
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption12,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Antara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationOpel Antara
4765 mmLength4596 mm
1795 mmWidth1850 mm
1490 mmHeight1761 mm
1575 KgWeight—
2725 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Mazda 6 and 2011 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…