DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Jeep Compass vs 2011 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Compass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
JeepMakeMazda
CompassModel6
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
10,70 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
180 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
170 HPPower163 HP
220 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,90 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6,40 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,10 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
4448 mmLength4765 mm
1812 mmWidth1795 mm
1718 mmHeight1490 mm
1535 KgWeight1575 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Jeep Compass and 2011 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Compass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…