DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Chevrolet Captiva vs 2011 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
CaptivaModel6
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeEstate
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
190 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
167 HPPower163 HP
230 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank64 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/60 R17 HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4673 mmLength4765 mm
1849 mmWidth1795 mm
1756 mmHeight1490 mm
1693-1798 KgWeight1575 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Chevrolet Captiva and 2011 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…