DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Citroen C-Crosser vs 2011 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C-Crosser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
C-CrosserModel6
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
190 km/hTop speed211 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
170 HPPower163 HP
232 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4646 mmLength4765 mm
1806 mmWidth1795 mm
1715 mmHeight1490 mm
1650 KgWeight1575 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Citroen C-Crosser and 2011 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…