2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 2.0 D (71 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
2000 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Kia Retona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
MazdaMakeKia
323ModelRetona
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
16,9 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
168 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
71 HPPower87 HP
128 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationKia Retona
4200 mmLength4000 mm
1705 mmWidth1745 mm
1410 mmHeight1835 mm
1150 KgWeight1505 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 323 and 2000 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…