2000 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.5/100
2000 Kia Retona vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 2.0 D (71 Hp) 2000Overall Score43.25/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
43.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
KiaMakeMazda
RetonaModel323
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
20,5 s0–100 km/h16,9 s
120 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
87 HPPower71 HP
200 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia RetonaSpecificationMazda 323
4000 mmLength4200 mm
1745 mmWidth1705 mm
1835 mmHeight1410 mm
1505 KgWeight1150 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Retona and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…