DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42.25–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
MazdaMakeMazda
323Model323
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
16,9 s0–100 km/h16,9 s
168 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
71 HPPower71 HP
128 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
4200 mmLength4200 mm
1705 mmWidth1705 mm
1410 mmHeight1410 mm
1150 KgWeight1150 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda 323 and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…