DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

42.25–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
LancerModel323
1999Model year2000
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,2 s0–100 km/h16,9 s
155 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
68 HPPower71 HP
123 NmTorque128 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4200 mm
1690 mmWidth1705 mm
1470 mmHeight1410 mm
1128 KgWeight1150 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Lancer and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…