DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMercedes-Benz
3ModelCLS
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4/5
5Doors4

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
250 km/hTop speed242 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
260 HPPower204 HP
380 NmTorque500 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank59 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears7G-TRONIC PLUS
225/40 R18Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4505 mmLength4940 mm
1770 mmWidth1881 mm
1460 mmHeight1416 mm
1395 KgWeight1785 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2874 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…