DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XF vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
JaguarMakeMazda
XFModel3
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
8,5 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
225 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
200 HPPower260 HP
450 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
—Tyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationMazda 3
4961 mmLength4505 mm
1939 mmWidth1770 mm
1468 mmHeight1460 mm
1735 KgWeight1395 Kg
2909 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XF and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…