DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Buick Regal vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Buick RegalSpecificationMazda 3
BuickMakeMazda
RegalModel3
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Buick RegalSpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h6,1 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
273 HPPower260 HP
400 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Buick RegalSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
10,7 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Buick RegalSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 R19Tyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Buick RegalSpecificationMazda 3
4831 mmLength4505 mm
1857 mmWidth1770 mm
1473 mmHeight1460 mm
1683 KgWeight1395 Kg
2738 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Buick Regal and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…