DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeMazda
CLSModel3
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4/5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
242 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
204 HPPower260 HP
500 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7G-TRONIC PLUSGears6
245/45 R17Tyre size225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4940 mmLength4505 mm
1881 mmWidth1770 mm
1416 mmHeight1460 mm
1785 KgWeight1395 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mercedes-Benz CLS and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…