2004 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6 CD (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Toyota Probox Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Toyota
Probox
Toyota Probox 1.5 i (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Probox
MazdaMakeToyota
3ModelProbox
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Probox
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Probox
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Probox
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Probox
4420 mmLength4195 mm
1755 mmWidth1695 mm
1465 mmHeight1525 mm
1275 KgWeight1030 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda 3 and 2004 Toyota Probox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…