DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Suzuki Escudo vs 2004 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeMazda
EscudoModel3
2004Model year2004
—Body typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
107 HPPower109 HP
144 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4420 mm
—Width1755 mm
—Height1465 mm
—Weight1275 Kg
—Wheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Suzuki Escudo and 2004 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…