DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara vs 2004 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SuzukiMakeMazda
Grand VitaraModel3
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
140 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
107 HPPower109 HP
144 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4090 mmLength4420 mm
1700 mmWidth1755 mm
1690 mmHeight1465 mm
1270 KgWeight1275 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 2004 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…