2004 • Toyota
Probox
Toyota Probox 1.5 i (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
2004 Toyota Probox vs 2004 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6 CD (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ProboxSpecificationMazda 3
ToyotaMakeMazda
ProboxModel3
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Toyota ProboxSpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
141 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota ProboxSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ProboxSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota ProboxSpecificationMazda 3
4195 mmLength4420 mm
1695 mmWidth1755 mm
1525 mmHeight1465 mm
1030 KgWeight1275 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Toyota Probox and 2004 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…