2004 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6 CD (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Toyota Porte Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Toyota
Porte
Toyota Porte 1.5i (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Porte
MazdaMakeToyota
3ModelPorte
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Porte
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Porte
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Porte
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Porte
4420 mmLength3990 mm
1755 mmWidth1690 mm
1465 mmHeight1720 mm
1275 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda 3 and 2004 Toyota Porte approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…