DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Toyota Corolla Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
3ModelCorolla
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
109 HPPower110 HP
240 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4420 mmLength4385 mm
1755 mmWidth1695 mm
1465 mmHeight1475 mm
1275 KgWeight1090 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 3 and 2004 Toyota Corolla approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…