DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSuzuki
3ModelGrand Vitara
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
109 HPPower107 HP
240 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank56 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption12 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4420 mmLength4090 mm
1755 mmWidth1700 mm
1465 mmHeight1690 mm
1275 KgWeight1270 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 3 and 2004 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…