DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Suzuki Escudo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSuzuki
3ModelEscudo
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
109 HPPower107 HP
240 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4420 mmLength—
1755 mmWidth—
1465 mmHeight—
1275 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 3 and 2004 Suzuki Escudo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…