DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda Demio
MazdaMakeMazda
3ModelDemio
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda Demio
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
109 HPPower113 HP
240 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda Demio
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda Demio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size175/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda Demio
4420 mmLength3925 mm
1755 mmWidth1680 mm
1465 mmHeight1530 mm
1275 KgWeight1100 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 3 and 2004 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…