2004 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 1.6 CD (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Citroen Saxo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Citroen
Saxo
Citroen Saxo 1.6 VTS (118 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen Saxo
MazdaMakeCitroen
3ModelSaxo
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen Saxo
11,5 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
182 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
109 HPPower118 HP
240 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen Saxo
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,2 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen Saxo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size185/55 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationCitroen Saxo
4420 mmLength3718 mm
1755 mmWidth1595 mm
1465 mmHeight1368 mm
1275 KgWeight935 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2385 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda 3 and 2004 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…