DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lincoln LS vs 2002 Lexus LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lexus LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lincoln LSSpecificationLexus LS
LincolnMakeLexus
LSModelLS
2003Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Lincoln LSSpecificationLexus LS
—0–100 km/h6,7 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement4293 cc
284 HPPower282 HP
388 NmTorque417 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Lincoln LSSpecificationLexus LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank84 lt
16 ltUrban consumption17,5 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lincoln LSSpecificationLexus LS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lincoln LSSpecificationLexus LS
4925 mmLength5005 mm
1860 mmWidth1830 mm
1450 mmHeight1470 mm
1710 KgWeight1830 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2925 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lincoln LS and 2002 Lexus LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lexus LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…