DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Cadillac CTS vs 2003 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeLincoln
CTSModelLS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h—
233 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
258 HPPower284 HP
346 NmTorque388 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank68 lt
16,2 ltUrban consumption16 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4925 mm
1793 mmWidth1860 mm
1440 mmHeight1450 mm
1722 KgWeight1710 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Cadillac CTS and 2003 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…